• HOME
  • TOUR
  • BIO
  • Director Bio
  • TV/FILM
  • Media
  • GALLERY
  • CONTACT
  • Beacon of Insignificance

Why Frankenstein (2025) Is One of the Best Shot and Acted Films I’ve Seen

January 12, 2026 by mark124

Why Frankenstein (2025) Is One of the Best Shot and Acted Films I’ve Seen

Look, I’ve seen a lot of movies. Occupational hazard. When you’re always hunting for material, studying film, or just trying to forget you’re eating mozzarella sticks alone after a Tuesday night gig in Southern Ohio (no disrespect, Ohio, your bars close early), movies become part of the job.

So when I say Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein is one of the best shot and acted films I’ve seen in years, that’s not hype. That’s me putting my tequila and mozzarella sticks down and losing myself in a movie.

This isn’t a “root for the mob” monster movie. It’s a film that made me sit there like, Oh… this is why movies get made.

Jacob Elordi Does Something Special

Let’s start with Jacob Elordi as The Creature, because this performance genuinely knocked me out. I went in expecting the usual: grunting, rain, lightning, and some dramatic arm extension. Instead, Elordi gives a heartbreaking performance. He was more heartbreaking than Jay Kelly (thats not a rip on Clooney, it was his character)

He completely disappears not just under makeup and prosthetics (which are incredible), but in posture, stillness, and vulnerability. He makes The Creature sympathetic without ever making him safe. You feel for him deeply… while also being aware he could tear someone in half if things go sideways.

What really got me—and this is the comedian brain at work—is how Elordi captures intelligence without polish. This Creature is learning everything in real time: language, emotion, rejection. He’s essentially a newborn trapped in an adult body with no stable emotions. Rage, confusion, longing—it’s all there, and never overplayed. It’s the kind of performance that reminds you that acting is such a craft, not just famous people in tailored clothes and hitting marks.

Oscar Isaac’s Tightrope

Oscar Isaac’s take on Victor Frankenstein is just as compelling. He doesn’t play Victor as a mustache-twirling villain or a tragic saint. He plays him as something much more unsettling: a charismatic guy who is absolutely convinced he’s right.

Isaac nails that arrogance. Not stupidity. The kind of Ego (or is it the Id?) that destroys lives while insisting it’s progress.

He essentially is an abusive father who refuses responsibility, and a “son” who wants acknowledgment more than revenge—except, you know, with murder strength.

Cinematography

This movie made me notice everything.

Del Toro uses close-ups, colors, and slow pushes like nobody else. And then there’s that shot—the camera traveling through The Creature’s body, into his beating heart. It sounds gimmicky as I type it (and misspell “Creature” four times) but it is not. It makes it come alive. In fact, it may be his “It’s ALIVE!” moment.

The color work is gorgeous and unsettling. Warm sunlight with grotesque imagery. Cold shadows keep you emotionally off-balance like a great Goya painting.

Horror With Actual Humanity

Del Toro never lets the horror drown out the human story.

He’s always been great with monsters, but here the monster may be the most human person in the room (well, he and the sea captain are my favorites). Quiet moments matter. Silence matters.

Alexandre Desplat Understands the Assignment

The score deserves real credit. It doesn’t tell you when to be scared; it tells you when to feel the tragedy, music that happens to be in a horror film, not “horror music.” If that makes sense.

Why This Hit Me as a Comedian

At its core, this movie is about learning how to be human. Social cues. Emotional feedback. Rejection. Desperate attempts to connect.

That’s… me doing stand-up.

The Creature is performing humanity, learning behavior through observation and imitation, especially with the old man. Watching that, I kept thinking about the line between performance and authenticity.

That question runs through the entire film, quietly, intelligently.

I love Paul Thomas Anderson. Depending on the day, he and Peter Farrelly fight for my personal first place in the Director Hall of Fame. But I didn’t agree with Best Film or Director. In 100 percent honesty, I did not watch “Hamnet”.

Frankenstein was snubbed. This movie fires on every cylinder: performance, direction, cinematography, score, and philosophical weight. It asks hard questions without announcing them. It lingers. It stays with you.

That’s the point.

Frankenstein isn’t just one of the best horror films of the year. It’s one of the best films, period. Beautiful, unsettling, deep—and unforgettable.

Back

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Why Philip Seymour Hoffman Was One of the Greats
  • My Hero(s)
  • Mix Tape era
  • Directors
  • Deer Season

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2023
  • May 2018
  • July 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • July 2014
  • April 2014

Join The Community!

Need a laugh? I will send you schedules for tours, fun clips, and other news (but not to worry, I'm lazy, so only a couple of times a year!) Join the mailing list here!

Follow Me

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2018 © Copyright @ MARK RICCADONNA –  All Rights Reserved